Tuesday afternoon with Levkovich and Brakhman was a guy’s session featuring two very fine, comparable performances. Tuesday evening was the women’s turn, but what a contrast between the equally excellent pianists Pallavi Mahidhara (USA/India) and Martina Filjak (Croatia).

She proceeded on to the second performance today of Debussy’s suite ‘Pour le Piano’, drawing elegant lines from the Hamburg Steinway. The first movement would have enjoyed a bit more room to breathe (and a little less pedal in spots). The Sarabande was tasteful and expressive, the Toccata well paced and excellently voiced.
Mahidhara ended with a curiously clinical account of Liszt’s b minor Sonata. She has an uncanny ability to keep simultaneous lines in different registers separate and distinct, to create huge contrasts from fiercely loud to almost inaudibly soft and to vary her touch from gossamer lightness to an intense heaviness. She brought amazing clarity to the final fugue, but in other sections of this rangy work, her articulation was uncharacteristically dry for Liszt. Mahidhara managed to tame the wild beast that is Liszt, but a lot of his over-the-top qualities got lost in the process.

Next came an astonishing performance of Scriabin’s ‘Nocturne for the left hand’. Close your eyes and you’d never know that her right hand was resting on the piano bench. Filjak adroitly moved about the keyboard with extraordinary sensitivity and accuracy, giving a nuanced and colorful account of this hauntingly beautiful piece.
For her finale, Filjak chose Beethoven’s wonderful but nearly intractable ‘Hammerklavier’ Sonata, op. 106, clearly articulating all the mercurial aspects of this strange piece. The first movement wasn’t note perfect (who gets all those notes anyway?), but full of passion and temperament, navigating adroitly between the violent and the lyrical and pointing up Beethoven’s odd accents. She brought out all the multiple phrasings of the motive in the Scherzo and expertly paced the lengthy and complex Adagio, maintaining interest and intensity. She began the finale haltingly as the music dictated, adding pearly runs and then heating it up to a frenzy as it morphed into a number of other ideas including a diabolical waltz and a fantastical fugue. This is Beethoven at his most volatile, and Filjak knew how to bring that out without losing sight of the underlying shape of this lengthy work.
Two different approaches tonight: one Apollonian, the other Dionysian. Each style had its fans in tonight’s large audience. If you were the jury, which would you prefer?


